|
|
Copied to:
The Prime Minister, Tony Blair.
The Lord Chief Justice. Lord Bingham.
The Master of the Rolls, Lord Woolf,
The Lord Chancellor, Lord Irvine,
The Home Secretary, Mr J.Straw.
Lord Justice Auld.
Lord Justice Pill.
The Chief Constable of Northumbria.
To all other interested persons.
The Chief Clerk, 16A The Lyons,
The Durham County Court, Hetton-le-Hole,
Hallgarth Street, Tyne-Wear DH5 OHT.
Durham.
My ref: LIP/MK/02
6th March 1999
Re: cases DH500950, DH400898, NE401650
IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST.
I, MAURICE KELLETT OF 16A THE LYONS, HETTON-LE-HOLE, TYNE-WEAR, DECLARE THAT THE STATEMENTS THAT I MAKE HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF.
Dear Sir
I write in connection with the above case numbers where I have been subject of gross injustice by judges who are clearly operating a feudal system of law. These acts are not only unlawful, but those who have carried them out are clearly guilty of malfeasance and use of kafkaesque tactics with all of the consequences thereby arising. The Magna Carta system of justice is still valid. Civil Wars of the mid-1640s secured its survival.
Under my rights protected by the Magna Carta, I accuse the following judges sitting at The Durham, Sunderland and Newcastle County Courts of carrying out unlawful feudal law and kafkaesque tactics. I now call upon them to account for their actions which I briefly detail below.
District Judge Cuthbertson:
He granted an injunction on 17th October 1995 after proceedings before him had been adjourned and I had not been informed of when the hearing was to recommence. The injunction was designed to prevent me from taking further evidence to show the perjury being used by my opponent, National Insurance Inspector Shirley Carr.
On 17th October 1995 Mr Phillips had unlawfully delegated work to Miss Carr's "McKenzie's friend" solicitor Alison Stott. Ms. Stott declared before the Newcastle County Court on 17th January 1996 that up until that time she had not been acting for S. Carr but had only been assisting her. In attendance when that declaration was made by Ms Stott. were myself, former Recorder John Fryer-Spedding, my wife Joyce Kellett, Counsel representing me Michelle Temple, and Miss S. Carr. My appeal against the unlawful circumstances of the granting of the injunction of 17th October 1995 was heard before Mr. Cuthbertson. In less than five minutes he refused my appeal. When the matter of the unlawful procedure of an appeal being heard before the judge as the order was being appealed from, it was alleged that I had used the wrong form on which to appeal. The form on which the appeal was made was the same which the Durham County Court supplied when requested for a form on which to lodge an appeal.
Mr Cuthbertson advised that I should not proceed with a libel action following statements made by S. Carr which were lies and extremely defamatory of me. It is not considered as being the lawful right of a judge to offer such advice under these circumstances.
Mr. Cuthbertson's unlawful injunction granted on 17th October 1995 was the instrument of my imprisonment at Durham on 6th July 1996 and my subsequent stroke.
Mr Cuthbertson struck out my father , William Kellett's action to regain possession of land which both he and I have lawful title, as an abuse of court time. Despite his use of lies, concoctions of false stories, and allowance of the liberal use of S. Carr's perjury, fully borne out by the substantial available evidence, former Recorder John Fryer-Spedding, agreed at The Newcastle County Court that my father was the one most likely to have title to the land in question. Mr. Cuthbertson thus effectively overruled the judgement of the higher Court. That was an additional abuse of his power.
Mr. Cuthbertson is under the circumstances not only considered as being guilty of the use of feudal law and kafkaesque methods but also as being an accessory to theft when by his act, S. Carr was allowed to register our land in her name. John Fryer-Spedding had ruled that S. Carr had no title to the land in question.
I have sent Mr. Cuthbertson a Bill of Costs for his actions in the sum of £50,000. I am informed by The Court Service that I cannot lay claim to costs from a judge. As Mr. Cuthbertson is considered to have abused his power as a judge he therefore stepped outside of the justice system bestowed and protected by Magna Carta. He is under these circumstances liable to pay damages and costs for his actions in the use of feudal and kafkaesque use of his power. The Bill of Costs that I sent to him for
£50, 000 has now been revised to £100,000 due to the further and continuing damage caused by his actions. I request that you pass on to Mr. Cuthbertson my new revised Bill of Costs which I consider in the circumstances I detail herein he has a liability to pay and that you enclose a copy of this documentation to him. If you are reluctant to do this then I request Mr. Cuthbertson's residential address when I then will be able to formally serve upon him the said Bill.
District Judge Scott-Phillips:
A letter Handed by Mr. Young to Mr Scott-Phillips, said to be a statement was handed to District Judge Cuthbertson. The contents of that letter were not disclosed to me and it was necessary to appeal his judgement. Mr Young, of Blackhall had caused damage to my property when the vehicle he was driving left the road and demolished part of my property. Mr Young had denied me access to his insurance company. In his reply to details requested by the Durham County Court Mr Young had alleged that he was not in employment. Investigations showed he was in well paid employment. He declared in a signed statement to the Court that his monthly out goings were £520 but that his income was nil. The appeal against Mr. Scott-Phillips judgement was heard by another District Judge which was illegal. The appeal against that was finally heard by a Circuit Judge.
On March 21st 1995 Mr. Scott-Phillips made an order that I be allowed to go to the Gilesgate office of solicitor Nancy Bone in Durham City on Thursday 23rd March 1995 to take copies from my files which she held by lien. Nancy Bone breached that order. When I returned to Mr. Scott-Phillips on the matter of Nancy Bone's Contempt of the Court, he alleged that my visit to her office was not an order of the court, but had been carried out only by the permission of Nancy Bone. Following the striking off from the Register of Solicitors and the closing down of her business, my files were returned to me. In the files there is a court attendance note where Nancy Bone referred to my visit to her office on 23rd March 1995 as "an order of the court". Solicitor Alison Stott, S. Carr's "McKenzie friend" sat in on proceedings on March 21st 1995 and she too accepted that Mr. Scott-Phillips had made an order that I be allowed to attend the offices of Nancy Bone on 23rd March 1995 to take copies from my files. She said that in those circumstances there should be no further delay in matters going to trial. Mr Scott-Phillips is considered as having abused his power by failing to act on Nancy Bone's Contempt of Court where I subsequently was prevented from taking any of the copies of documentation from her which I required to proceed both with my two cases as plaintiff and one as defendant.
Former Recorder John Fryer-Spedding:
Mr Fryer-Spedding acts were an absolute abuse of power which has amounted to tyranny. He interfered with my cross examination of S. Carr and warned me that I would not gain by my drawing attention to him of her conflicting statements while she was under oath. He allowed Counsel representing S. Carr, Mr Merritt, to introduce into proceedings my "arguments with Freemasons". That subject had no bearing whatsoever on the issues before John Fryer-Spedding. He made several quiet statements to Mr Merrit while I delivered my cases and defence. He made statements that were contrary to law. He lied in respect of the evidence that I put before him. He wrongly alleged that the three cases had been consolidated where I was then referred to as the defendant in all, whereas I was the plaintiff in two of them. On 1st June 1994 District Judge Scott-Phillips ordered that the cases could not be consolidated. That order still stood at the time of the trial. Some of John Fryer-Spedding's unlawful acts are more particularly detailed in my affidavit of 13th August 1997 in my fathers case number DH604359 and my affidavit of 4th November 1997 in case numbers DH400950 and DH400898. A judge is held by duty to act when he is aware that perjury has been used in proceedings before him/her. All judges who have been in receipt of these latter affidavits have thus failed to act upon the sworn statements placed in them.
I consider that other judges are guilty of reckless justice and consideration will be given to their actions in due course.
Former Recorder John Fryer- Spedding's Feudal and kafkaesque form of justice has been an unlawful act contributing and resulting in extreme stress and deterioration of my health. I therefore require and demand full and proper retribution for his unlawful acts. In the Public Interest and the interests of Magna Carta justice, the statements which I have made in my two affidavits of 13th August and 4th November 1997 must be examined by the courts and either be deemed to be true or untrue. If the contents of my affidavits are deemed to be untrue then the courts are duty bound to commence an action against me for perjury. If the contents of the affidavits are deemed true and I have sworn an oath and provided evidence that they are, then former Recorder John Fryer-Spedding's judgement for the purposes of justice becomes void and full retribution for his acts are required and demanded under Magna Carta justice.
In furtherance of the Public Interest and Justice because Freemasonry was raised as an issue by Counsel for S. Carr in proceedings, I therefore require and make demand that the following judges declare any membership, either past or present, of membership of Freemasonry. I also make this demand in the circumstances of possible conflict of interests and that it was common knowledge that I was thanked by the Rt. Hon. Lord Nolan for a dossier which I sent to him in May of 1996. I understand it was used by The House of Commons Home Affairs Select Committee Enquiry into Freemasonry within the Police and Judiciary.
District Judge P. Cuthbertson. District Judge Scott-Phillips, District Judge Jones, and former Recorder John Fryer-Spedding.
Failure to declare any such possible membership of Freemasonry will be regarded as an obstruction of and perversion of justice. I declare as of right that I will call upon any available evidence or any evidence that might be made available to me following investigations should I dispute any such declaration made by these judges.
My rights are additionally protected under the ruling of the Rt. Hon. Lord Denning which he made in 1956 which is:
a) " No Court in this land will allow a person to keep an advantage which he has obtained by fraud. No judgement of a Court, no order of a Minister, can be allowed to stand if it has been obtained by fraud. Fraud unravels everything."
b) The United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948.
d) The principle of Magna Carta Justice.
e) The principle that no man is above the law.
In the circumstances that I detail herein, I , Maurice Kellett, of 16A The Lyons, Hetton-le-Hole, Tyne-Wear, hereby declare that the judgement of Former Recorder John-Fryer-Spedding made on 24th October 1996 is void and that all judgements following and connected with that judgement are, for the purposes of valid Magna Carta justice and in the Public Interest also void. I also demand and claim full retribution from all persons involved and named herein while carrying out their unlawful feudal justice and kafkaesque methods against me.
I ALSO DECLARE AS OF RIGHT that any further moves against me to enforce the corrupt acts of those I name herein shall be regarded as unlawful and that I am entitled to defend against any such possible moves by all and any means available to me as may at the particular time be required.
Signed this day 6th day of March 1999
By me
Maurice Kellett.
-----------------------------------------------------
Hours after I published the above letter I was arrested by police at 9.30am on Tuesday 9th March and detained at Washington Police Station, Tyne and Wear. No charges were read out to me. I had been told that I had breached a restraining order but no details were given regarding the allegation. Shortly after my arrest I requested medical attention. No doctor arrived. I also asked to see a solicitor. None arrived. I asked to make a telephone call as was my right but I was not given access to the telephone. After two hours Duty Sergeant Robinson telephoned a doctor directly who then instructed that police should take me to hospital. On examination at the hospital it was confirmed that I had serious health problems. A tube that hospital staff inserted into a vein kinked and gave me considerable pain. My arm is badly bruised because of that. More on this matter later.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LATEST 19 MARCH 1999. REPLY RECEIVED FROM THE COURT SERVICE TO MY ABOVE LETTER AND MY REPLY TO IT.
Copied to others in the Public Interest.
The Court Service 16A The Lyons,
Group Managers Office, Hetton-le-Hole,
Newcastle Group of Courts, Tyne-Wear DH5 OHT.
4th Floor,
Westgate House,
Westgate Road,
Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 1RR.
March 19 1999 Your Ref:GMO/3.2.20/99
My Ref: PP/JKS/02
IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST
Dear Mrs Henley
I am in receipt of your reply dated 17 March 1999. For clarity I here recite its contents.
"Dear Sir
COUNTY COURT CASE NUMBERS: DH400950, DH400898 AND NE401650.
Your letter dated 6 March 1999 with enclosure addressed to the Court Manager at Durham County Court has been forwarded to this office for response as the Group Manager has overall administrative responsibility for the Newcastle Group of courts.I am aware that the points you raise were dealt with when you entered into correspondence with the Lord Chancellors Department in London during January 1998, and I cannot add anything further to Mr Willink's responses dated 31 January and 20 February 1998. However, I will be happy to deal with any new issues you wish to raise.
I am copying this letter and your correspondence to The Lord Chancellors Department, Selbourne House, 54-60 Victoria Street, London SW1E 2QB.
Yours faithfully
Mrs J. Henley
Group Finance & Performance Officer."
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Mrs Henley
In reply to your letter above, you have failed to answer any of the facts and questions which I have raised in my letter of March 6 1999. I would add that Mr Willink's also failed to supply the answers of which I both require and demand.
I would further remind you that failure to act on matters where improper conduct is reported can be regarded as Misconduct in Public Office. It is clear to me now that the corruption that I have reported is being ignored, and under these circumstances must be regarded as being assisted at a very high level of authority.
Your reply is not acceptable as clearly you have failed to answer in a proper manner to the issues that I raise. Your falling back on Mr Willink's letters which too gave no answers is only prolonging a situation which sooner or later will have to be addressed in full. This Mrs Henley is the situation that I have continually came up against in a Court system which clearly has many corrupt elements within it. Corrupt elements which I claim are of Masonic Mafia origin. I am sure that you are aware that Freemasonry infests the whole of the legal system? It takes little imagination to know why this is. Clearly the fact that none of the judges whom I both require and demand declare any membership of Freemasonry have failed to do so. That I am sure must be taken as proof in itself Mrs Henley. I have named those judges in my letter of 6 March. Freemasonry has entered into the issues in the civil proceedings, therefore the matter of possible conflict of interests most certainly applies. I was also proud to have been thanked by the Rt. Hon Lord Nolan for a dossier which I sent to him in May of 1996 which I understand was used by the House of Commons Home Affairs Select Committee enquiry into Freemasonry within the Police and Judiciary. That was made common knowledge and Masons made me aware that they did not like me having done that. No doubt Mrs Henley my reward for doing that has been handed out by those members of the judiciary whom I have named to you.
Judges are not exempt from the rules and once they decide to step outside of them they invite a very serious situation indeed.
The trial before former Recorder John H. Fryer-Spedding in October of 1996 was most certainly unlawful. On 1st June 1994 an Order was made in the Durham County Court by District Judge Scott-Phillips ordering that the three above cases could not be consolidated into the action NE401650. My opponent, Miss Shirley Carr, who was neither qualified or authorised to prepare the Judges Bundle, has admitted that she deliberately left out that order of 1st June 1994. At the time that District Judge Scott-Phillips gave the work of preparing the Judges Bundle to solicitor Alison Stott she was only an assistant (or McKenzie friend) to Miss Carr. She declared that fact to the Newcastle County Court on 17th January 1996 in the presence of myself and my wife Joyce Kellett, Shirley Carr, former Recorder John H. Fryer Spedding, and Counsel Michelle Temple. Affidavits were sworn with regard to the declaration then made by Alison Stott. Alison Stott secretly passed on the work of preparing the bundles to Miss Carr. The matter only came to light when considerable other documentation paginated in the bundle was also missing from it. I was not at that time in a position to verify the full extent of the documentation that Shirley Carr had excluded from the Judges Bundle. My own files which would have assisted in showing the full extent of the excluded documentation were being held by lien by former Nancy Bone Solicitors. I thank God they have now been closed down and Mrs Bone has been struck from the Register of Solicitors. Alison Stott and Shirley Carr were fully aware that I was unable to call upon my files at that time.
The fact is shown by evidence that John H. Fryer-Spedding lied, concocted false stories, and allowed Miss Carr the liberal use of perjury. Part of that evidence is contained in my affidavit of 13 August 1997 submitted in case No.DH604359 and additionally one sworn on 4th November 1997 submitted in case numbers DH400950 and DH400898. To repeat myself yet again, either the information and evidence that I have sworn in those affidavits is deemed to be untrue, in which case I am guilty of perjury, or be deemed to be true in which case justice demands urgent action to remedy the situation. The situation of the courts effectively sitting in the middle and ignoring what I have sworn is in itself an act of injustice. I would further inform you of a fact which I believe you will probably know. A judge is duty bound to act when he is aware that perjury is being used. He has no choice in the matter. It is in the common public interest that judges must do so.
It is very clear that certain members of the civil Judiciary with whom I have been involved with over these past five years are quite prepared to allow perjury and tell lies themselves so as to force corrupt judgements. Mrs Henley, I have absolutely no intention whatsoever in conceding the issues that I raise. By side tracking the issues you become part of the original corruption. Corruption is certainly something that I shall never give way to and I do not exclude any measures that may need to be taken to combat it. When judges move outside of law and rules, and the evidence that I have provided shows this, then their judgements must for the sake of Justice be declared as void. I again declare former John H.Fryer-Spedding's judgement as void and I will protect my rights where not only his lies, concoctions of false stories, and use of perjury have been used against me by him, there is also no doubt that in the matters of the conduct of Alison Stott and Miss Shirley Carr there is no question that they have used fraud and deception to obtain an unfair advantage. The court granting work to an "assistant" of a litigant, which Stott agreed she had been, is a serious infringement of my rights and the rules and regulations of Court procedure of which we all are bound.
Yesterday I was declared bankrupt because I cannot pay the costs of the Order made by the very corrupt former Recorder John H. Fryer-Spedding. I would warn you that I have no intention of becoming the lamb led to slaughter by the acts of the corrupt people whom I name. I have asked that my allegations be examined by a none Masonic Christian minded body. The problem is I think though finding someone involved in the system who is either not a mason or one who is prepared to confront them. Until such proper enquiry is carried out I must in all conscience defend my rights. John H. Fryer-Spedding's acts and others I name have been acts of tyranny and oppression. Too many people have died in too many wars Mrs Henley for me to concede that tyranny and oppression is an acceptable part of my life. The blood spilled by the millions in those wars protects and serves as a seal on my rights. If my own blood also has to be spilled in the process of defending my God given rights then so be it. I wont go away Mrs Henley and I will never give up.
There is no place whatsoever in the system of justice for Secret Societies such as the Freemasons. Yet as I have written, Freemasonry literally infests itself in the whole of the Judicial, legal, and law enforcement systems.
I ask now that you reply in full to the matters and questions that I raise. I would advise you that there is need now of great urgency for you to do this. I do not accept bankruptcy as the reward for exposing corruption and as the fruits of it. John H. Fryer-Spedding is grossly guilty of Misconduct in Public Office by the evidence that I have provided to the Courts to show that. I also thank God as well that the only honourable thing he seemed to do was to take sudden retirement when I reported some of his vile acts to former Lord Chancellor Mackay.
I went for an interview with Inspector Atkinson at Washington Area Police Headquarters shortly before last Christmas. He was aware that my approach to him was to request that police take action against John H. Fryer-Spedding for Misconduct in Public Office. A Sergeant Urquhart had already expressed an opinion following brief examination of the available evidence that there could be a question of action having been taken to pervert the course of justice. I arrived at the meeting with the Inspector with some of the evidence to support my allegations. His first words to me were that he had telephoned the Home Office in London. He said the instructions that they gave to him was that as my allegations related to civil proceedings then he was not to act on what I reported to him. What sort of Justice system have we Mrs Henley when Misconduct in these circumstances is being segregated as either civil or criminal misconduct? Surely sanity says that misconduct which causes anyone damage is a criminal matter? This I think is truly representative of the very sad state of affairs which now exists.
I am sure Mrs Henley that in any properly conducted enquiry evidence of allegations is always required. Not once have I yet been asked by the Court Service to provide any such evidence? The Court Service is set up for the public is it not? Not as a service to the Courts, which it would seem to be, in helping to conceal corrupt acts that I know from many other people now often occur in them.
Please Mrs Henley, don't become part of corruption by assisting in covering it up. Truth nearly always prevails in the end. The extremely vile acts of which I report have brought about the destruction of most of the things that I valued most in my life including my marriage. Hell will surely freeze over now before I would even think of letting these corrupt people get away with what they have done.
Yours sincerely
Mr M. Kellett.
Contents of the reply to the copy of my letter of 6 March 1999 sent to Lord Chancellor Irvine. The letter was received from The Lord Chancellors Department at Slbourne House, 54-60 Victoria Street, London.
Dear Sir,
Thank you for your letter dated Saturday, 6 March 1999 to Lord Chancellor which was received on Monday,22 March 1999. I have been asked to reply.
This matter appears to be the responsibility of the Court Service. I have therefore passed your letter and a copy of this one to them for reply.
Yours sincerely
S Begum
Departmental Correspondence Unit.
----------------------------------
This is the usual procedure adopted when questions touching on corruption are referred to high authority. I dont think I need to think too much about what the reply from the Court Service will be and I dont think that it will be acceptable. Further letters to Chancellor Lord Irvine, Master of The Rolls Lord Woolf and Lord Chief Justice Bingham are to follow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Sir
COUNTY COURT CASE NUMBERS: DH500950 (should be DH400950), DH400898, NE401650.
I refer to your letter dated 19 March 1999. Unfortunately I am not in a position to enter into correspondence regarding the points you have made in your letter. I am aware that Judicial Correspondence Unit, Judicial Group, Lord Chancellor's Department, Selbourne House, 54-60 Victoria Street, LONDON SW1E 2QB have correspondence with you on this matter.
I have therefore referred this matter to the Judicial Corespondence Unit in London.
Yours faithfully
Mrs J Henley.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply received from the Court Service dated April 1 1999.
"Dear Mr Kellett,
Thank you for your letter of 6 March 1999 addressed to the Lord Chancellor. I am also in receipt of your letters of the same date addressed to the Court Manager at Durham County Court, the Home Secretary, and the Lord Chancellor.
While I appreciate your concerns about the outcome of your cases, there is nothing further I can add to the replies you have already received from this office. The points you have raised have therefore been noted and your letter placed on file.
Yours sincerely
Carole Maslin
Customer Service Unit"
-----------------------------------------
My reply to Ms.Carole Maslin dated April 17 1999.
TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST.
Also copied to the Prime Minister at 10 Downing Street London via fax 17 April 1999 and MP Mr C. Mullin Chairman of the House of Commons Home Affairs Select Committee.
Carole Maslin, 16A The Lyons,
The Court Service, Hetton-le-Hole,
Customer Service Unit, Tyne-Wear DH5 OHT.
Southside,
105 Victoria Street,
London SW1E 6QT.
Your Ref: TO18338
CA96/429/3 17 April 1999
Dear Ms. Maslin,
I thank you for your letter of 1st April and reply herewith.
It is noted that there has been no reply to my demands contained in my letter of 6 March 1999 that former Recorder John H. Fryer-Spedding, District judges Cuthbertson, Scott-Phillips,and Jones, ( North East Circuit) declare any membership of Freemasonry and whether or not they have ever attended at any Masonic Hall or establishment. I make these demands under the rules of possible Conflicts of Interests. In May of 1996 I was thanked by Lord Nolan for a dossier that I suplied for use by the House of Commons Home affairs Select Committee Enquiry into Freemasonry within the Police and Judiciary. It was public knowledge that I had done that. Certainly Freemasons were aware that I had done that by reason of the threats that I received following it.
My "arguments with Freemasons" was also introduced in the illegal proceedings before the former Recorder Fryer-Spedding in October of 1996 and that subject had nothing whatsoever to do with the issues to be decided. The cases had been wrongly tried as a consolidated action, whereas on 1st June 1994 an Order had been made by District Judge Scott-Phillips refusing consolidation of the cases. My opponent Miss Shirley Carr, who was the applicant for that consolidation, has now agreed that she left the copy of that Order out of the Judges bundle when she prepared it without the knowledge or consent of the court. Her partner in that fraud was her McKenzie friend solicitor Alison Stott.
The former Recorder John H. Fryer-Spedding, lied, concocted false stories, allowed Miss Carr the liberal use of perjury, and made statements (contained in his approved transcript of judgement) which were and are contrary to law. The only other possible explanations for his actions are that he was under the influence of alcohol or drugs, did not have Chancery experience, or failed to have a full and proper knowledge of the law. I have no reason to suppose that any of these latter possible explanations were responsible for his vile acts. In the circumstances I can only assume that his acts were calculated and deliberate. All that requires explanation now is as to why he carried out these acts which were a perversion of the course of justice. I have no reasons whatsoever but to suppose that Freemasonry had a hand in his vile acts. I cannot be held to a judgement of such a man and no power on this earth will make me submit to it.
On June 6 1997 I was refused leave to appeal by Lords Justices Auld and Pill. Although there were three cases at issue for leave to appeal but I was only allowed the same time as is allowed for one case. In the summing up I believe it was Lord Justice Auld who spent quite a long time trying to dispel my concerns about Freemasonry. He failed to do that. It is sometime since I wrote to their Lords Justices making the same demand that they now declare any membership of Freemasonry and whether they also have attended at any Masonic Halls or establishments. Up to this present time I have not received a reply from them. NO MAN IS ABOVE THE LAW and I include those I name herein who would appear to believe that the law and Court rules do not apply to them.
A dossier is currently under preparation to be submitted to Lords Justices Auld and Pill. On the basis of the evidence that I can now show to substantiate my allegations against those I name. I am to request that their June 6 1997 ruling refusing me leave to appeal be anulled. There are reasons to believe that Lord Justice Auld may be a Freemason so under the principles of possible Conflicts of Interests he should not have presided at my application for leave to appeal.
In 1997 after my approach to the Lord Chief Justice Bingham and Master of the Rolls Lord Woolf, they ruled that it should be left to the individual judge whether or not to declare membership of Freemasonry. Again under the same principles of possible Conflicts of Interests, it would not be in the interests of justice that a Freemason should make rules concerning Freemasonry unless they themselves are prepared to make such required declaration concerning any membership of Freemasonry. The reply to my very recent letter to Lord Bingham making this demand has avoided answering that demand I have made of him in The Public Interest.
I still await a reply from Lord Woolf and indeed Lord Irvine in regard to the same demand that I have made of them. Freemasonry is not exempt from the commonly accepted principles of Conflicts of Interests.
I still proceed under the rulings and principles contained in the latter part of my letter of 6 March 1999 which I copy here again.
Ms. Maslin, I can show that some members of the Judiciary are corrupt and that the whole system is infested with Freemasonry. Freemasonry is without any doubt whatsoever the worlds largest Secret Society. What is of even greater concern is that the indications are that such corruption is being covered by men in high authority. Any man who carries out or assists in or with the perversion of the course of justice is considered as automatically disqualifying himself from that position of authority with all of the subsequent consequences thereby arising.
I seek justice at the hands of a system, which as I have written, can be shown to be unjust especially when those who come before the system have fallen foul of Freemasonry. There is no place whatsoever for Secret Societies influencing or being responsible for perverting the course of justice, yet as can be shown, the whole system is infested with it.
Less than two weeks ago the subject of my alleged bankruptcy was published on the front page of The Sunderland Echo newspaper. The bankrupty has been engineered from Court Costs ordered by the former Recorder, the very corrupt John H. Fryer-Spedding. I have been barred in continuing being a local Councillor because of the rules where a bankrupt is not allowed to be a Councillor, that too was published. My father was extremely upset at what was published in that newspaper. Two days later he collapsed and died. I attribute his death at that time to those involved, whom I have named, in carrying out acts to pervert the course of justice which has enabled the alleged bankruptcy to be engineered. I now know that what has been done to me has also been done to many others who have fallen foul of Freemasons. Some I also know have opted for suicide as a way out, when it became clear that the laws of the land no longer applied to them. This situation will end and I can assure you that I am resolved, regardless of the threats etc. which have been carried out against me, to use whatever is left of my life to work to bring about a system of justice that is free from the infestation of Secret Societies.
On 6 March 1999 I published my letter to the Durham County Court Manager of that same date of which you make reply. At 9.30am the following morning police attended my home and arrested me without charge. I was denied the use of a telephone at Washington Police Headquarters, I required a duty solicitor but did not see one, I required a doctor and I was denied that as well. After two hours of detention when the duty sergeant saw that I was ill he telephoned a doctor. When I spoke to that doctor following his request of the sergeant that he be allowed to talk to me, he told police that I must be taken straight to hospital. I was "dumped" outside of the Sunderland Royal Hospital by the two arresting police officers where it was then confirmed that my condition was life threatening. These Ms. Maslin are the true facts of a system which protects Freemasonry and uses the abuse of power to do it.
As a further example of injustice shortly before last Christmas I attended Washington Police Headquarters for an interview with Inspector Atkinson. The purpose of my visit there was to request police to take action against the former Recorder John H. Fryer-Spedding for Misconduct in Public Office and of the fraud that had been used against me to pervert the course of justice. When I arrived there with documentary evidence to support my allegations, Inspector Atkinson told me that he had just telephoned the Home Office. He said that their instructions were that as my allegations concerned civil proceedings, then he should not take any action on what I reported to him. It would now seem from that visit that fraud and Misconduct in Public Office are exempt from police action unless such acts have been committed in the course criminal litigation. I am sure you will agree that this has to be further evidence of a system which is prepared to use any reason to help cover corrupt acts when the system so requires it. Fraud and Misconduct in Public Office remain as such whether they have been used in either civil or criminal proceedings. I again require that those I have demanded make the necessary declarations contained in my letter of 6 March 1999, do so forthwith.
Yours sincerely
M. M. Kellett
----------------------------
NOTE, letter of March 6 is copied at the start of this page.
Any E-mail please to: Justice@jiwalu.demon.co.uk