|
|
Published In The Public Interest..
LATEST
Wednesday March 8 2000
I arrived at the Durham Crown Court at 9.40am on Thursday March 2 2000 for my trial for alleged harassment of Miss Shirley Carr. Carr has been my civil law opponent for more than five years and some of the evidence of the perjury she used in that action is published on this site. She had conspired against me with solicitor Alison Stott of Durham City. Evidence of Carr's perjury has been supplied to Northumbria Police but they have failed to act on it. Mason Chief Constables such as Northumbria Chief constable Mr C. Strachan will never favour anti-masons. Even though I thought I was late in arriving at the court (Time stated for the trial was 10am) neither my barrister or solicitor were present. Shortly afterwards I collapsed and an ambulance was called. As I was being taken to the ambulance my barrister arrived. He told me that my appeal against the other conviction of alleged harassment of Carr had in fact not failed and that the letter I received from my solicitor Mr Hughes stating that it had was a misunderstanding. Strangely, the Durham Crown Court had previously agreed that my trial could not go ahead until the appeal process in the earlier case had ran its course?
I was given oxygen in the ambulance as I had trouble breathing and was placed on a cardiac monitoring machine. A tube was inserted into an artery in my right arm. On admission to the hospital ward 18 of Dryburn Hospital, Durham, I was placed on another cardiograph machine. I was given medication for a heart condition. The following day I was transferred to ward 11. A huge swelling had appeared above my right knee. I was subject of further cardiac monitoring. On Monday 6 March I was visited by hospital consultant Mr Cook and three junior doctors. He agreed that it was almost certain that I had a heart condition and quoted to the junior doctors that a cardiac monitor had suggested this. I gave him the reason that I had walked out of the cardiac care ward (4) of Dryburn hospital a month earlier was by reason that what was being planned for me there would have been illegal. I went on to say that I believed it was a course of action under which masons were probably involved. I said that I had became aware that many doctors were also masons. I raised the fact that I had evidence that my medical records had been falsified (in 1998) Mr Cook made no reply to that. I told him that I would be referring the matter of the falsification of information on my medical records to the British Medical Authorities. I had became aware that my medical records had ben falsified in 1998 after a visit to one of my doctors, a Mr Sartoris of the West Rainton Surgery, Co. Durham. Recently another doctor at that surgery, a Mr Wylie, made fasle allegations about me which is also to be subject of formal complaint to the Medical Council. I did not agree with Mr Cook's explanation for the swelling that had taken place on my right leg. That swelling had taken place only within a matter of hours and was not fluid leaking from some other inflamed joint, of that I am certain.
Yesterday afternoon Mr Cook came to me and asked if he might speak to me in private. He took me to the Sisters office where she too sat in on our conversation. What he said left me in little doubt that an attempt to section me under the Mental Health Act was to take place today (Wednesday 8 March). He said police would also attend the hospital. That did not surprise at all and I told Mr Cook that it was a known Masonic ploy to try to discredit an anti-mason by calling into question his or her sanity. What was surprising though was that Mr Cook then told me that there was no problem with my heart which was a complete reversal of the statement he had made the previous day while he was accompanied by three junior doctors. Later yesterday I examined the hospital addmission record. I saw that it too contained false information. I showed the evidence of that to others at the hospital just before I walked out of it again last night. Whether that untrue information had been by error or intent I dont know, but those who saw the proof of that untrue information agreed that what was written on the hospital notes was not true. Shortly before leaving the hospital I had a meeting with the ward Sister and expressed my concern over the fact that Mr Cook had given two differing statements about my medical condition in less than twenty four hours. I had earlier discussed the matter with Mr Cook of my course of action in exposing Masonic corruption. He said he did not wish to become involved in that subject.
On Monday 6 March a staff nurse removed the tube that had been inserted into one of my arteries. Shortly afterwards where it had been inserted became inflamed and started to swell. I told the staff nurse about it and she placed a clear polythene dressing over the area but applied no antiseptic. Later another staff nurse examined the inflamed area when my wrist and hand began to swell. She applied a new dressing after squeezing some of the inflamation out of the wound.. Yesterday my wrist and hand became even worse. Yesterday morning I asked the same staff nurse who had removed the tube from my artery to give me treatment for the infection. By six thirty last night she had not taken any action on that matter. Two days ago another nurse had taken a swab of the infected area so that the correct antibiotic might be administered. That too did not appear to have been actioned. I left the hospital in a worse state than when I entered it. It was necessary for my brother to dress the wound late last night. Before leaving the hospital, I distributed a "Public Interest" leaflet on the ward. The leaflet regarding the Masonic Mafia has been under general national distribution for the past few months. I had contributed to its contents. I dont know what the corrupt authorities will attempt now, but once again they have proved to me that at least some of those concerned in these latest events are indeed corrupt and that their action against me does concern my expose of corrupt Freemasonry.
Tuesday February 29, 2000
I was with my solicitor Mr Hughes, of Harding Swinburne & Jackson, 58 Frederick Street, Sunderland, on the evening of Thursday 24 February from 5.30pm to 6.50pm. He told me that he did not know when my latest appeal against my alleged harassment of Miss Shirley Carr was to be heard. Carr is the National Insurance Inspector who used very material perjury against me in the civil action between us. Northumbria Police have been in receipt of the evidence since August 1999 that Carr had used that material perjury. They have not acted on it but instead have played out a game of deception. with me, (click on blue print below in para. dated Feb.27 for some of the evidence to show this). Carr conspired against me with solicitor Alison Stott of Durham City. Evidence of this is also published on this site. Another criminal, former recorder John H.Fryer-Spedding is also being protected by Masonic Mafia Northumbria Policemen.
Today I received by post a judgment made by a judge Moir refusing my appeal of my alleged harassment of Carr. It was stamped as having been received by my solicitor on Friday 25 February 2000 i.e. the day after Mr Hughes had told me he did not know when my appeal was to be heard. It would now appear that not only was I not made aware of the date of the appeal but that it seems I was not represented by my barrister at it either. Judge Moir has failed to answer part of the case put forward by my barrister that the bench at my previous appeal should have declared any interest in Freemasonry. They had refused to do that despite being told that I had taken part in the Nolan Enquiry into Freemasonry within the Police and Judiciary. When Lord Hoffman had failed to declare that he was a member of Amnesty International in the matter of General Pinochet, that was deemed to have been a conflict of interests thus upholding the age old tradition that a court must be impartial to the proceedings before it. To correct that situation it cost the British taxpayer somewhere between one and two million pounds. My own case involves non declaration of interests of Freemasonry by judges involved both in the civil and now in the criminal litigation that has been commenced against me by the Masonic Mafia who without any doubt whatsoever rule or influence the British police and judiciary. What is of even more concern is that Freemasory is also known as the Brotherhood. In fact they refer to one another as brothers. This sets it above the normal category of possible conflict of interests.
No man may rule in his own cause but daily masons rule in our courts often against their own pre selected victims. Lord Irvine, Woolf, and Bingham have failed to reply to my requirement that they too should declare any interest in Freemasonry. They made rulings in the civil proceedings between Carr and I. I cannot accept their rulings until they too can show that they were impartial to matters I placed before them.Woolf and Bingham ruled that it should be left to the individual judge whether or not to declare membership of freemasonry. They placed no conditions whatsoever on that ruling. In the light of this, they set freemasonry above the normal accepted principles where possible conflicts of interests are concerned. All had been supplied with substantial evidence of Carr's perjury but failed in their public duty to act on it. By doing this, they can be adjudged as being guilty of the crime of misconduct in public office (Regina -v- Dytham) which can carry with it a prison sentence of up to seven years.They are not outside of the law and they are employed in the service of the public whether they like to accept this fact or not. A title added to their names is not an escape route from justice and law. Visit http://members.xoom.com/ILFHR/ to see the present actions of the International League For Human Rights in the matter of their concern into corruption and Freemasonry. You might then see just how serious the situation is. Their President has expressed an interest in the Masonic Mafia operations against me and wishes to appear in court to give evidence on my behalf.
It had been agreed by the Durham Crown Court that until my appeal process against Carr's allegations that I had harassed her had been completed, then I would not be tried under a new and false allegation made by Carr that I had harassed her. Because of the ruling made by Moir in the circumstances I detail above, my trial has quickly been listed to commence at the Durham Crown Court on 2 March. Neither my barrister ar Mr Hughes were available for comment today. The death of my barrister's mother has made him unavailable and I respect this fact. My barrister and I have not even had a meeting to discuss the case due for trial on Thursday. None of the evidence which was to have been prepared by my solicitor has been carried out.
I contacted the Durham Crown Court by telephone to report some of the facts I have detailed above. I was told that they would be relayed to Judge Ord. I have also made clear to the court that following the Masonic Mafia instigated action against me of a month ago detailed in these pages, I am without any General Practitioner or very essential medication. While I am now in very serious danger of a heart attack or stroke without the further stress of the latest events, I have been warned by the Crown Court that unless I attend there on Thursday a warrant for my arrest will be issued. The improper circumstances of my appeal now dictates that a new appeal will be lodged in regard to it. Therefore as previously agreed by the Durham Crown Court my trial cannot proceed until the appeal process has been exhausted. It remains to be seen whether the Crown Court will honour its agreement. I have requested that the trial be put back.
It has now been confirmed that we do have female mason judges. In a recent national newspaper article, three female judges have admitted to being masons. Thirty two female magistrates have now also admitted to being masons. They are only the thin edge of the massive Masonic wedge. At my appeal heard on December 21 1999 the female judge laughed and said something like, "Of course I cannot be a Freemason". Freemasonry is now using many women to do their dirty work By doing so they seek to avoid any suspicion of their involvement into corruption, conspiracy, and fraud. I add that after the present government were elected, they threatened to force judges and magistrates to say whether they were masons. This was criticised by senior judges. Britain is living under a lie that the judiciary are independent of Government. In fact Lord Irvine, who heads the courts, is a an unelected government cabinet minister. Its time he declared whether or not he is a masin. circumstances suggest that he is and is therefore duty bound to appoint only mason judges wherever possible.
If nothing else, my life has been worthwhile by defying in giving way to the Masonic Mafia corruption used against me. Likened to rats coming out of their holes, masons have exposed just how corrupt an organisation they are. The evidence of this has been circulated to others in the event of my death. Some of it has been published on this site. The author of a death threat made against me on New Years day has been tracked down to a police officer residing in North Yorkshire. He had signed it under the name of The Great Architect which is of course a Masonic term. The Masonic cess pit is seemingly bottomless. Only death will prevent me from continuing with my expose of freemasonry and I think they know this now.
Sunday February 27, 2000
Sunday 20 February 2000
On Sunday January 29 January I found a note placed through my letterbox asking me to contact a PC Davidson at New Elvet Police Station, Durham City. When I spoke by telephone to him he said that there was an allegation that I had harassed someone. He would give me no further details. I attended at the Police Station the following day. I was then arrested by Davidson. He alleged that I had made a threat against a doctor. I will name the doctor in due course. He has already been named to others along with details of the false allegation. One of these people has already published those details. Even though I made a short statement to Davidson while we walked up the public footpath of New Elvet, he did not write any of it down. My solicitor Mr Hughes, of 58 Frederick Street, Sunderland, joined us as we entered the police cells. I had made contact with him earlier that morning. I told Davidson that there was not a single element of truth in the allegation that had been made. It was then made clear to me by the allegation that the Masonic cess pit was even deeper than I had first thought. Around a year or so ago, James Todd who publishes VOMIT (Victims of Masonic Ill Treatment) and is also a mason, had warned me that the medical profession too are riddled with masons. That became very clear to me last January 30. The doctor who has made the allegation is nothing but a liar and I can only think in the circumstances now that he is also a mason. I neither telephoned him or made any threat whatsoever against him at any time. In these circumstances I dont consider that he is fit to practice medicine.
I was locked up for three hours and though I required some very essential medication I was denied access to it. Throughout the whole of my detention I had been told by police that a doctor had been summoned. I believe that they had lied. At the outset police said they wanted to search my home and unless I told them where the key to it was they threatened to break the door of it down. Mr Hughes said they were allowed to do that but said he would go with police while they carried out the search. I was not told then and dont know now what police were allegedly searching for. An order signed by a senior police officer was required before the search could be made. I saw no such order. The affair was beginning to show all the hallmarks of the Masonic Mafia controlled police with the assistance this time of a doctor who has now committed a criminal act against me by making the utterly false allegation of which I refer. Just how many doctors are out there like Harold Shipman? The doctor concerned had been taking an unheathy interest in my legal affairs when I last met and spoke with him last year at his surgery for a normal examination. If the man is not a mason then its certain he is doing their bidding which is not an unusual situation.
When Mr Hughes arrived back from the police search of my home he said he was pleased to tell me that there had been no damage caused to it. I think its now very apparent that police had some other motive for wanting to carry out the search. Masonic policemen will always have an interest in what anti-masons have in their homes.
Very shortly afterwards an ambulance arrived and I was taken to Dryburn Hospital, Durham City. By that time I was in a state of collapse. No doctor had seen me while I was in police custody. Following my unlawful arrest by Northumbria Police in March of 1999 where my life also came under considerable threat as a result of it, here again was even more proof to show why in recent years so many have been found dead while being held in police custody. People will say this sort of thing does not happen. I know by my own personal experience that it does and that Masonic Mafia controlled police dont give a damn about whether a mans life is placed in danger or not. The ultimate corruption can only be the corruption of the police and judiciary. We in the UK have this situation right now.
On Monday January 31 2000 I had been due to meet a former policeman at Darlington, Co. Durham at around 3pm. In the circumstances Durham police prevented my being able to keep that appointment. The former policemen said he wanted to have a talk with me and that he had been interviewed after he had left the police force on the matter of the Cleveland police officer Ray Mallen. Ray had been making a huge impact into exposing crime within the Cleveland Police Force area. It seems he made too many enemies within Cleveland Police while doing that which had ended in his suspension. Facts sometimes have a habit of speaking for themselves. A few days ago I spoke with the former policeman by telephone. He does not now want to talk about whatever it was he had previously wanted to talk to me about. He had been aware that I was to attend New Elvet police station earlier on January 31.
At Dryburn Hospital I was placed on a cardiograph machine and was then transferred to the cardiac care ward. Something was spayed beneath my tongue. Later I was given other medication. Davidson and another police officer had accompanied the ambulance to the hospital but left after waiting two hours or so. Davidson warned me not to publicise anything about the matter. Ordinarily I might have accepted such a warning, but not when it would help cover the tracks of criminals who are clearly masons taking action to try to silence me. The only way they will succeed in doing this is to kill me. Constuctive murder in selected cases is also a weapon used by the Masonic Mafia. I dont doubt for one moment that this is their present plan for me. If I am to accept the apparent findings at Dryburn Hospital, then my life expectancy may in fact be even shorter than a doctor Sartoris suggested to me some months ago. Another death threat was made against me by e-mail some weeks ago. It was signed by The Great Architect, a Masonic term. Some of my friends suggested that I report the matter to police but whats the point of referring to police matters of a criminal nature when so many of the Masonic Mafia controlled police are shown to be criminals themselves?
On Tuesday February 1 it had became clear that I had a very serious health problem which had been brought about by Durham Police action the previous day. I saw several doctors during my two days in the hospital. Later on that Tuesday afternoon I overheard a telephone conversation a staff nurse was having with someone. The treatment that was being planned for me from what I overheard would have been unlawful, but as James Todd of Victims of Masonic Ill Treatment publications has told me many times, once you become an anti-mason there is no law to protect you. I heard the evidence of it in that telephone conversation. Despite being told that there were serious risks in discharging myself from hospital, and that I was required to carry out some formalities before doing so, I removed all of the probes that were attached to me. A nurse at first refused to remove a tube that had been inserted into one of my veins. She said that if I removed it I would bleed to death. When she saw that I was about to do that anyway she eventually removed it. Moves were made in an attempt to stop me leaving the hospital. Something took place outside of it which had never happened to me before. Because of it, I was able to get a long distance away without trying to walk it.
I left the area shortly afterwards and did not return home until over a week later. On my arrival back I found a number of my files that I held on other victims of Freemasonry and some of my personal property had been taken. It had not been taken by police but by a mason. All of my personal effects had also been sifted through. I had made a big mistake when I trusted him and his wife, but just as James Todd had also told me, a mason will shake you with one hand while sticking a knife into your back with the other. That has never been made more clear to me than that which has taken place recently. This matter is to be pursued.
In the meanwhile, Northumbria Police Authority are still failing in their duty to refer my complaints and allegations relative to mason Chief Constable Strachan and senior police officers of Northumbria Police to another police force for investigation. It may be a matter of pure coincidence, but one day before this false allegation was made by the doctor, I had again sent a fax to the Northumbria Police Authority warning them of the duty I required of it under Section 86 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984. I will shortly be publishing photographic proof of the fact that the Police Authority are not telling me the truth. Criminals I have named herein, along with some evidence supporting this, such as Miss Shirley Carr, solicitor Alison Stott, former recorder John H. Fryer-Spedding and others still walk free while organised criminal acts are carried out against me by authority. By showing me what they are capable of, they have also bared their flanks. If I am unable to take advantage of this situation to show that the Masonic Mafia are very active within our police and judiciary, I know that others will with whom I am in contact. Its another situation where unless you come face to face with the Masonic Mafia, you neither know or will accept the probably that this situation exists. Britain is under the jackboot and that has never been made more clear to me than now.
The names of all those involved in this latest matter have been circulated to others just in case of my death. Matters relative to both my wife and I have also been made fully known to others in the event of such a situation. There was no divorce when she had used massive fraud etc. to obtain it before a judge who will not admit or deny that he attends Masonic Halls. When she decided to use the Masonic scum as a means to rob and defraud me, it was she who breached our marriage contract not I. The marriage oath that I made before God on August 31 1968 still stands. It was not a contract made before men and no man, especially a bent judge, can alter this fact. The divorce was granted as if giving away a cheap plastic novelty from a christmas cracker. I was not even asked by the judge to reply to my wifes case for divorce. A solicitor named Brian Morton had suggested that it was not even worth my while going to Harrogate Counrty Court to contest the action. He too was eventually to prove to me his real nature as well. The judge, named Grills and Mellors were well acquainted. Grills and Mellors were also well aware of my action to expose the Masonic Mafia now ruling both our courts and police. My wife had even discussed the matter with Mellors even though she too had assisted me in the logging of the registration details of vehicles used by masons during their visits to Masonic Halls. She was very aware that most judges are in fact masons. Grills and Mellors were also aware that I had taken part in the Nolan Enquiry into Freemasonry within the Police and Judiciary. That Enquiry was I now consider nothing short of a white wash job. Is it likely that a mason judge and solicitor would be swayed by a thing called justice when they saw the means to cause me harm?
Divorce is often widely advised by parasite solicitors because its a situation where cash and assets of the couple can then be easily converted into legal costs. I became even more aware of this situation during a recent visit to a meeting in London of Litigants in Person. It might be an old fashioned idea now, but the courts must be impartial to the proceedings before them. This is now shown as being totally ignored by the Masonic Mafia now ruling them. My wife's other acts of forgery etc. are also supported by documentary evidence which as things stand will in all probability be published.. My death or otherwise will not prevent legal action from being taken against her though I will take no pleasure whatsoever from it. Both she and I went through a lot in our thirty years together but she eventually made the mistake of believing that the Masonic scum could not be beaten and saw an opportunity to take advantage of what was in fact our situation. She should have carefully considered what took place an hour before her father died in November of 1997 after I had asked the hospital Chaplain to pray for him. She might then have learned a huge lesson from it. I wondere if she remebers how long she cried for in our bedroom after criminal Spedding had gave judgment in favour of criminal Carr? Another strange incident similar to that prior to the death of my father in law regarding a member of my family took place while I attended a Christian revival meeting at the Docklands London Arena. I was one of probably less than a dozen white faces in a sea of thousands of coloured people. We even got a special mention because we had attended that meeting. I saw something there which will remain with me for the rest of my days. My wife I am sure will eventually be called to account for her actions before the greatest power of all. Those too residing in Dacre Banks, North Yorkshire, will also eventually become aware of the acts which my wife has carried out against me in her ride to hell. I never would have believed possible that a woman with whom I had spent thirty four years with, could become the person evidence will show that she had became. She was to totally betray the trust I placed in her. I have been advised to publish all the facts of this as an example to those who like me believed that such a thing would not be possible.
A lady named Linda who I met while I was recently away from home showed me that not all women are like my wife. We shared what we had together and she went a long way to changing my point of view following my wife's betrayal. If you might be reading this Linda, I still await your phone call. I truly hope that you were able to resolve your own dire situation. I missed you a lot after you headed off and I looked for you in the village afterwards. I am sorry that I was reluctant to take a walk around the village with you on that last day and regretted my decision. If there is a next time that we both brave the elements of bad weather in the mountains together again, and I hope there will be, I will be equipped for it. If I dont hear from you Linda, my sincere thanks for the beautiful memory of my having met you. It was necessary in both of our circumstances that we both fully trusted one another. You got full marks for having done that. Your future hopes you told me about Linda will I am certain come true. Never let them leave you. You know God and showed me that in more ways than one. He will not let you down. You helped me more than you may ever know and that was not only in the meals you made for us. It was my priviledge to have met and shared what I had with you. Whenever I see a prawn sandwich, I will remember the one you shared with me and the occasion surrounding it. God Bless you my dear friend as I am sure he will.
Solicitor Mellors, of Barber Titley Solicitors, North Park Road in Harrogate, still fails to give me a reason of why the huge sum of my and my wife's money was handed over to him by my wife. The Masonic parasites are of course very active within the legal profession. From them come tomorrows judges. You now have an insight into the background to many of our corrupt judges. They also went through the same process as legal profession parasites. Maybe this could be a further reason why more than one in three marriages fail? Divorce is a massive business and often has little to do with the situation between man and his wife. Its a great opportunity for the legal parasites to go to work to carry out what might be regarded as legalised robbery. The wife of one of my friends, a Mr Jenkins, was also advised to divorce him when another fabricated bankruptcy case had also been rigged against him. She did not take that advice. Another victim, a Mr Brian Hudson, whom I met in London some months ago, was defrauded of millions of pounds in similar circumstances. Even his house in Rome was robbed from him. His wife divorced him and was made to feel secure. Then the Legal Mafia parasites struck and took her for everything she had as well. I understand that she had also been having an affair with a solicitor involved in the defrauding of Mr Hudson. Legal parasites will stoop to any depths just so long as the money keeps rolling in. I wonder just how much of that money finds its way back to the corrupt Masonic Mafia judges now operating within the UK courts?
Saturday 22 January 2000.
Letter received from my solicitor Mr Hughes. Again he has failed to answer any of the urgent questions I have asked of him in my previous letters to him. (Still true as of February 20 2000)
The security services interfered with my telephone after I had a long call from a friend in London who is also subject of Masonic Judicial Mafia operations. To them I would say this. One day you may yourselves become the victims of the criminals you assist today. If that does not happen, then maybe that same situation might arise with your offspring? We are not the ones who are a threat to the security of this country, we are only a threat to the exposure of corruption that is rife within high authority. Much of that corruption arises from the evil roots of the Masonic Mafia who now play a major part in ruling the UK. I cannot think that what you did today was by accident but rather as a way of amusing yourselves by showing to me just how powerful you are. Its because of this, that the likes of I and many others are now prepared to fight a system of power that is corrupt to the core. You will have heard during my phone conversation this afternoon that my friend in London has some more evidence of Masonic Mafia operations. That evidence will be made available to the public no matter what measures you try to carry out. Right will always prevail and asseholes like you are two a penny.
Friday 21 January 21 2000.
Still no reply has been received from my solicitor Mr Hughes to the letter I delivered to him this week. There has also not been any reply received from the Clerk to the Northumbria Police Authority, Mr L. N. Elton to my letter which I sent to him last week.
Tuesday 17 January 2000.
At last, documents and forms that were urgent at the start of this year have been received from solicitor Mr CD Hughes of Harding Swinburne Jackson 58 Frederick Street, Sunderland. He has made it clear that he does not intend to reply to my letter to him of December 28 1999 which was also marked urgent. He has not therefore told me why I was not required to sign against the allegations/statements that I made to Detective Inspector Steven Coxon and another police officer on June 30 1999 at the office of Mr Hughes with him in attendance throughout. Today I delivered another letter to him along with the forms I received from him this morning which I completed upon receipt. I have included again the above question and included again the matter of my unlawful arrest in March of 1999. The fact that Mr Hughes is not willing to reply to my letter to him of December 28 1999 raises some very serious issues.
It has been decided to go ahead with an appeal on the refusal to allow my appeal against my alleged harassment of my six year civil law opponent Miss Shirley Carr. This has been advised by my barrister in whom I have the greatest confidence. I have now published on these pages some of the available evidence to show that Carr was happy to use perjury in my civil proceedings against her. More is available and will published in due course.
Latest Information as of Monday 16 January 2000.
Still no reply from solicitor Mr Hughes to my Urgent letter to him of December 28 1999 or subsequent letters I have sent to him. In addition, he has still not sent me the forms to complete which he said he required urgently.
My solicitor Mr Hughes of, Harding Swinburne Jackson & Co, 58 Frederick Street, Sunderland, Tyne-Wear, has still failed to answer a letter which I sent to him via fax on December 28. The letter was marked URGENT and required answers to very important questions. One question that requires an urgent answer from Mr Hughes was why when I had a meeting with acting Detective Inspector Steven Coxon and another police offficer at his office on June 30 1999, with Mr Hughes present throughout the more than two hour meeting, I had not been required to place my signature against the various allegations and complaints I then made to the DI Coxon. The other officer appeared as if she was noting my statements. Its now clear that DI Coxon had not carried out any investigation as he said he would. The matter was nothing short of a deception excercise designed to play for time to allow ongoing events to overtake me.
I sent Mr Hughes a further fax letter asking him why he had not replied to the questions I placed in my letter to him of December 28. Still he failed to give reason for his failure to reply. Shortly afterwards I received a letter from Mr Hughes saying that by now I would have received the documents he sent to me along with a form for me to comlete which he said was required urgently. I had received no such documentation or form
I contacted his office by telephone and was told that Mr Hughes was not in. The man who answered the telephone took details which included the fact that Mr Hughes had failed to reply to my letter of 28 December. I also told him that I had still not received the form Mr Hughes had referred to. He said he would have Mr Hughes contact me. At the present time of Sunday 15 January 2000 Mr Hughes has still failed to contact me or provide me with the form. Also in my letter to Mr Hughes was a matter concerning another solicitor who it has came to light has carried out what amounts to a criminal act against me and the state. I think Mr Hughes should have reported that matter to the Law Society when I made him aware of the facts regarding it. Instead, he will not discuss it. Failing a proper resolution to these matters, I will have little choice but to publish my letters to him. Its clear that the whole object of my meeting with DI Coxon on June 30, 1999 was a means into deceiving me that a formal police enquiry was to take place in regard to my allegations/complaints I then made. Those allegations and complaints included the fact that Miss Shirley Carr, my civil litigation opponent for five years, and solicitor Alison Stott of Durham City had taken action amounting to fraud, and conspiracy to defraud. Carr had also been allowed to use very material perjury in the actions between us. The evidence of these facts has been provided to Northumbria Police who have failed to take action on it. Some of it now published on these web pages. By doing this, those officers involved, are shown by their none action to be guilty of the crime of misconduct in public office. It can carry a prison sentence with it of up to seven years. These people obviously think that they are above the law. They may be about to be proved wrong. Also included in matters detailed to DI Coxon was the unlawful proceedings at Houghton-le-Spring Magistrates Court in 1986. I had been battered and then struck by a car that was driven at me. The magistrate who heard the case was not qualified to act alone. The Clerk to the Justices at the court, Mr Bavidge, who still holds that position, was involved in an attempted cover up of those unlawful proceedings. The Lord Chancellors Department did the rest of the job by saying that as the information I required might be used for mischevious purposes, it was not to be provided to me. All I had requested was whether the magistrate concerned was or was not qualified to act alone. No doubt the Lord Chancellor of that time was also a mason. Certainly if Lord Mackay held that position at that time, then it is known that he is indeed a mason so there is no point in saying anything else about that matter right now.
I also detailed to DI Coxon the unlawful arrest of me in March 1999. I made a statement, none of which was written by the two police officers who carried out that unlawful arrest. They would not allow it to be known where I had been taken and detained. They refused my access to both a doctor and a solicitor. Both officers have committed perjury in a statement they have sworn regarding that matter. Though that matter was a very serious one, and I have made it known to Mr Hughes several times that I wish to sue Northumbria Police regarding it, the cycles both he and DI Coxon seem to be riding are ones with reverse gears only.
Mr L.N. Elton of Northumbria Police Authority finally decided this week to reply to a letter I sent to him in early December 1999. I had then advised him that he was committing mens-rea by his deliberate action by deliberately failing to refer my allegations to an outside police force for investigation. In his letter of this week he wrote that my allegations were being investigated by Northumbria Police. In my reply to him I again made it known that he was duty bound to refer the matter to another police force for investigation, and that by failing in that, he is under consideration as being guilty of the crime of misconduct in public office. I also advised him that Northumbria Police have agreed to me that at this time they are not carrying out an investigation. The Masonic Pigs trough is a very deep one. It could not be clearer now that Northumbria Police and their Authority are probably both feeding from it.
On Friday evening, Mr Myers of the Official Receivers Office at Stockton telephoned me. I informed him that his head of department, Mr Inglis had not replied to a letter I delivered to him regarding part of the criminal acts carried out against me by my wife who now resides at our property in Dacre Banks, North Yorkshire. Mr Inglis had also not replied to my questionare relative to the evidence I supplied for his use of substantial perjury that Miss Shirley Carr had used against me in the civil proceedings which criminal former Recorder John H. Fryer-Spedding had used as the means to engineer my alleged bankruptcy. I was ordered to cooperate with Mr Inglis of suffer imprisonment. Cooperation is a two way affair but it seems that Mr Inglis has not looked in the dictionary to verify this fact. If he fails to answer the questions I have placed in writing to him, then I will report the matter to the court to see what the Masonic Mafia decide is to be their next course of action against me. In the meantime, Miss Shirley Carr, solicitor Alison Stott and the criminal judges involved in perverting the course of justice still walk free. Chief Constable and mason Mr Strachan is still protecting these criminals. The Masonic oath of which he swore demands that he does this to protect the Masonic Brotherhood. This is only one reason why no member of any secret society should ever be allowed to hold public office, let alone the position of Chief Constable.
Divorce proceedings that my wife commenced against me were heard before a man, if I can be excused for calling him that, who could none other than have been aware that my wife was lying. I wrote to the Court that even a man with limited intelligence would have known that she was. He denied he was a mason, but would not confirm or deny that he had visited Masonic Halls. I was ill before that hearing, and was admitted to Harrogate District Hospital immediately after that charade. The judge had not even asked if I wished to reply to the false allegations that my wife had made. Her solicitor, a Mr Mellors, had obviously advised her that as a way of preserving what she had stolen from me, divorce would be necessary. Mellors is going to be in some trouble because he was required to answer my questions which included the reason my wife had handed over to him several thousand pounds of our money. Many others with whom I am in touch have been subject of similar treatment involving other solicitors or rather, to give them their true title, Legal Masonic Mafia Parasites.
Last year I met with a Mr Brian Hudson in London who was defrauded by similar means of 13 million pounds worth of cash and assets. Mr Hudson was a well known industrialist who had employed at one time, I believe something like thirty five thousand people. His wife too had been given assurances, but once she divorced Mr Hudson, the legal profession parasites converted everything she too had into legal costs. This is the way the Masonic Judicial and Legal Mafia work. It is all part of a massive business. The divorce in my instance was obtained by my fraud and there is proof of this. Under a ruling by the late Lord Denning, which is still valid, no order of any court or government minister can stand if fraud has been used to obtain it. This matter will eventually be fully addressed. It was nothing short of a further horror story to learn that a woman with whom I had been married for thirty years could carry out that which she did. All of her acts are to be subject of full publication for the reason I am told she is a fine example of what other women are carrying out against their husbands, especially when they want a toy boy to satisfy their requirements. Yes, I do admit that the hell our neighbour Miss Shirley Carr and the Masonic Mafia helping her created for us both was substantial. However, what my wife then decided was that if I could not beat them, then she would join them. She did it in a most evil manner. She had even taken part in my tour of Masonic Halls and had logged registration details of cars being driven by masons, for use in my own investigations. When I collapsed in Harrogate and was hospitalised, she even refused to return back to was our home to see that our two dogs were fed. A family member had to break the door to gain entry to see to them. She had always maintained that she loved our dogs, but that was put to the test and she also failed that one as well. The antedote for the poison she used against me will shortly be put to the test. Some say that the occult practices used by some senior masons could responsible for my wife's actions.
We had sat with her father as he died in November of 1997. In the summer of 1997 he and I had talked a lot about God, Christ and what this life was all about. One hour before he died he did something, even though he was in a deep coma, which convinced me that what I had told him about the great beyond was true. Even the hospital chaplain who I asked to attend was astonished at what took place then. My wife did not want me to call for the chaplain because she said it would upset her. Her statement at the time her father was stuggling for every breath, was like a knife to my chest. I am glad that I ignored her and called the chaplain. I do believe her father made the required grade and that in his last act, he had told me without words, more than he had ever told me in all the thirty four years I had known him. An incident in the London Arena in October of last year was equally astonishing. It related to my daughter Dawn. My meeting with a former barrister and a true Christian employed at the London Court of Appeal was something I shall treasure until my death. My wife should have heeded the signs of the strange things that happened when and after this barrister asked me to read Ephesians Chaper six after my files went missing at the London Court of Appeal. This person remains as a true personal Christian friend. I truly thank God for our meeting.
It seems ever increasing more likely that I will now have to finish matters with a physical defence of my property. I will do this to the best of my means and ability. I accept that I will be no match for the force the Masonic Judicial and Police Mafia may use against me. I do believe that heaven and hell also exist on earth. Life has proved this to me. I am not afraid of doing now what I must should the situation arise. I still hope that God Almighty will forgive those who have delivered me to this hell, especially my wife. Vengeance I am very sure will ultimately be the Lords as is written in the Holy Bible. No one has ever walked away from acts of evil such as those being used against me.
LATEST INFORMATION AS OF JANUARY 7, 2000. CRIMINALS AND THEIR CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES DETAILED.
LATEST INFORMATION AS OF NOVEMBER, 27 1999.
On Monday November 15 1999 the Masonic Judicial Mafia operating from the Durham County Court issued a warrant for my arrest. I had failed to appear for a public examination of an alleged bankruptcy engineered by Deputy District Judge Baird, District judges Scott-Phillips, Cuthbertson and former recorder John H. Fryer-Spedding. Other judges assisted with the engineering of it. Probable reason? I had investigated Freemasonry and had taken part in the Nolan Enquiry into Freemasonry within the Police and Judiciary. Both of these authorities are infested with masons.Vengeance is mine sayeth the Lord but Lucifer worshipping masons with their own fabricated God, know little of the real spirit of our real creator, the one true Lord God.
On Wednesday November, 17 I received a letter from the Northumberland Police Authority which indicated they were committing means-rea and were operating outside of the Police and Criminal evidence Act (Pace). Below follows a copy of the contents of the letter sent to the Northumbria Police Authority which at this time has not received a reply. In view of the fact that the British Justice system is so infested with masons, it would come as no great surprise if Northumbria Police Authority are also infested or influenced by it. early signs are that they are.
--------------------------------------------
1 of 4.
Sent via fax Wednesday November, 17 1999.
Mr L.N. Elton,
Northumbria Police Authority 16A The Lyons,
Civic Centre, Hetton-le-Hole,
Regent Street, Tyne-Wear DH5 0HT.
Gateshead NE8 1HH
Fax 0191 4782755
Your Ref: MMc/MA
November, 17 1999.
Dear Mr Elton
I am in receipt of you letter of November, 16 1999.
I do not accept the statements that you have made in it by reason of the following:
The complaints that I make against the Chief Constable and Officers under him amount to the crime of misconduct in public office ( Regina -v- Dytham, a copy of the ruling in that case accompanies this letter). Any police officer who fails to carry out a duty required of him is guilty of the crime of misconduct in public office. As a Police Authority surely you are fully aware of this fact?
The complaints which I have made to you, and I would add only in brief detail, do amount to misconduct in public office. Section 86 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 states:
(1) Where a complaint about the conduct of a senior officer is submitted to the appropriate authority it shall be the authority's duty to record it and, (subject to subsection 2 below), to investigate it.
(2) The appropriate authority may deal with the complaint according to the appropriate authority's discretion, if satisfied that the conduct complained of, even if proved, would not justify a criminal or disciplinary charge.
(3) In any other case the appropriate authority shall appoint an officer from the appropriate authority's force or from some other force to investigate the complaint.
(5) No officer may be appointed unless he is of at least the rank of the officer whom the complaint is made.
With reference to paragraph (2) of the Act above, the allegations which I make do amount to the criminal act of misconduct in public office under the ruling in Regina -v- Dytham. As such the Northumbria Police Authority do not have the power of discretion in these circumstances.
I am very concerned that they may now be an additional factor of your having demonstrated means-rea. As an Authority you will I believe be aware that misconduct while holding public office does amount to a criminal offence under the ruling in Regina -v- Dytham and therefore under paragraph (3) of the said Act this matter must be investigated by another police force as my complaint of misconduct does extend to the Chief Constable of Northumbria which you have agreed.
Yours sincerely
Mr M. Kellett
Enc. Copy of the ruling under Regina V Dytham.
Copy of relevant sections of the 1984 Police and Criminal evidence Act 1984.
(No reply has been made to me by the Northumbria Police Authority as of November 27 1999)
-----------------------------------------------
The following morning these events took place:
On Thursday November, 18 1999 at approximately nine thirty in the morning a number of men, some of them policemen, estimated at between six to nine attempted to enter my home. At least two of them were dressed in body armour and were probably armed marksmen. Parked next to police vehicles was a large black car with tainted black windows which resembled the type of vehicle sometimes used by an undertaker. Following my having been taken from my home in March of this year by police under false pretences, where all of my rights were denied me, I would not open the door to the mob who were assembled outside. Mr Strachan, the Chief Constable of Northumbria has failed to answer a letter I sent to him in which I had included my request that he admit or deny he is a mason. Information I was given suggests that he is. As a mason would the Chief Constable not be biased against me knowing that I have been exposing the Brotherhood of Freemasonry?
Two further visits were made to my home by police officers on Friday November, 26 1999. On the second visit, Carr, who has used very material perjury in the civil proceedings between us, and is being both protected and used against me by Northumbria Police, was observed crouching behind an adjoining fence and was looking into my property. As is the usual conduct of Mason Chief constables, they will always protect the criminal against anti-masons and this is again being shown in my situation. Police were provided months ago with the evidence of Carr's perjury. Solicitor Alison Stott of Durham City and Carr have admitted fraud during the civil proceedings in which masons have used to engineer my alleged bankruptcy. Stott should also have been arrested by now had Northumbria police done their duty. The civil proceedings were unlawful and John H. Fryer-Spedding agreed in his approved transcript of judgment that he was depriving me of my rights. These are the true fact of a police and justice system which is being shown to be rotten to the core.
Acting detective Inspecter Steven Coxon has informed my solicitor, Mr Hughes, of Harding Swinburne and Jackson of 58 Frederick Street, Sunderland that he will now prepare a progress report but will have to wait until Detective Superintendent Atkinson based at Washington Police Headquarters returns from leave in December. Until very recently D.I. Coxon had failed to reply to my solicitor and myself. My meeting with DI Coxon took place at the office of my solicitor on June, 30, 1999. It is now becoming clear why there has been very apparent delaying tactics by police. Carr and judges at the Durham County should have been arrested by now for their criminal acts. Evidence of these acts has been provided to Northumbria Police and Peter Leaver QC. They have failed to do their duty and act on that evidence. By reason of this, they become guilty of the crime of misconduct in public office (Regina -v- Dytham). This crime can carry with it a prison sentence of up to seven years.
I had a two hour meeting with detective Superintendent last December. When I arrived at Washington he immediately told me that he had just telephoned the Home Office. He said they had told him not act on my allegations because they related to civil proceedings. He also told me that perjury was not a police matter. When I asked him if he was a mason, he replied that as he was not duty bound to give that information, then he would not give it. My allegations under PACE also extend to Detective Superintendent Atkinson as well as the Chief Constable Mr Strachan.
On Friday November, 26, I reported ongoing matters to the National Criminal Intelligence Service. Staff officer Mr Nigel Dewing noted and recorded the information which I gave to him. He also took a note of this web site.
Tony Benn said on national TV two weeks ago that under Tony Blair we are heading for a dictatorship. This would seem to be borne out by his backing of a reversal of past principles that a person is presumed innocent until proven guilty to one of being presumed guilty until proven innocent. Under the Queens spech the right to be tried by jury is being removed. These are not signs of a fairer Britain as promised by Blair. The " Big Issue" has now published Blairs membership of the Bilderberg Council. The Bilderbergs are another secret society whose policies involve a single world government with a single world currency. They also want a substantial decrease in the world human population. Lord Carrington leads the UK Bilderbergers.
Information has been received that MI13 have set up a department to attack selected web sites.
On Friday November, 26 I had a telephone discussion with a member of the Court Service Staff in London. I had just received a letter which verifies that Lord Chief Justice Bingham , Lord Chancellor Irvine, and Master of the Rolls Woolf have excluded membership of Freemasonry as a possible interest in court proceedings. The right to a fair trial under Article 6 of the European Convention of Human Rights is thus being seriously violated in favour of Freemasonry. We are now subject of European Law. These people are openly defying that law and the rights of people who seek justice from the British courts. The recent ruling under Lord Hoffman/Pinoche case which cost the taxpayer to put right also applies to my case.I had contributed to the Nolan Enquiry into Freemasonry within the Police and Judiciary. Masons informed me that they would not allow me to continue with my investigations into their organisation. As none of the judges I have required to declare or deny membership of Freemasonry have done so. Its a foregone conclusion that they are in fact masons and that the courts I have appeared before have not been impartial as is required under our justice system. They are also obviously being protected by the people in high authority I have mentioned earlier. In the circumstances it is shown that double standards are being excercised by the British Judiciary. The Courts are operating outside of law and rules which is now bringing to light a very serious situation. They cannot be allowed to continue this fuedal system of justice. The evidence to show the use of the courts to defraud litigants is being collated by others and in due course will be subject of publication.
LATEST INFORMATION AS OF OCTOBER, 30 1999.
On October, 15 1999 I appeared before Mr Peter Leaver QC in the matter of my appeal against alleged bankruptcy. He had previously been supplied with substantial evidence that the proceedings under which the bankruptcy had been engineered was unlawful and that former Recorder John H. Fryer-Spedding had in fact committed substantial High Treason. He indicated he had no interest in how the alleged bankruptcy came about. He said all he was interested in was the actual bankruptcy order itself. I argued with him that it was material that the proceedings before Spedding were illegal and that judges had lied to bring the situation about. He would not allow my appeal and awared further costs of two thousand pounds. I told him as he had failed to act on the evidence of fraud, conspiracy to defraud, and perjury used to engineer my alleged bankruptcy, then in turn I would not accept his ruling or his order for further costs. Peter Leaver QC had in fact breached his judicial oath by failing to act in a fair manner. He too is therefore considered as being party to High Treason. I failed to ask him if Master of the Rolls Woolf had briefed him prior to my appearance there. It is likely that he had. Tony Blair and the Attorney General have been informed that it is now my intension to protect both myself and my property by all and every possible means. There is more than a little evidence that Woolf, Master of the Rolls, Bingham, Lord Chief Justice, and Irvine, Lord Chancellor, have ignored the considerable evidence that I have sent to them which shows beyond all doubt that proceedings before Spedding was illegal. Home Secretary Straw has also been supplied with the same evidence but he too has failed in his duty to take action on it. Blair is too busy trying to make himself a world figure, but he too has been sent evidence of my allegations. I do not think any of these people are fit to rule anyone and none of them are above the law though perhaps they may believe they are.Wolf, Bingham, Irvine, Auld, Pill, and all of the other judges involved have still failed in my lawful requirement that they admit or deny any membership of Freemasonry. This requirement was made in view of the fact that I did contribute to the Standards in Public Life Committee Enquiry into Freemasonry within the Police and Justiciary. Any mason judges presiding over my cases could not therefore be considered as being impartial.
Because Lord Justice Hoffman failed to make a declaration in regard to Amnesty International in the Pinochet matter, it cost the tax payer one million pounds to have that situation corrected. Here we have a similar situation in relation to Freemasonry but its clear there are indeed different rules for different people. I will never swallow this. Tyranny is at work against me and I shall now defend myself against it by every means at my disposal. Those involved in it must be brought to trial. I have no intension whatsoever in recognising courts which have been presided over by very corrupt men protecred by high authority. I can now understand why the British Judicial system is said to be the laughing stock of the world.
I have now officially lodged a complaint to the Northumbria Police Authority under Section 86 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984. Detective Steven Coxon has still failed to reply to the numerous requests by myself and my solicitor for a progress report on his alleged investigations into what I reported to him on June, 30 1999. Part of the evidence that I supplied for his use was considerable evidence of the perjury used by Miss Shirley Carr during the civil proceedings between us. Two actions regarding Carr's allegations that I had harassed her are still waiting. One is my appeal against conviction for alleged harassment of her that was made by a court that was not impartial. DI Coxon said he would investigate that matter as well but seven weeks on from him allegedly carrying out investigations, he had still not commenced any such alleged investigation. The next allegation is to be tried before a jury at my request. Carr is of course is the chief prosecution witness. I allege that the police do not want to act on Carr's perjury because of the Masonic influence within Northumbria Police Force. It would not of course look very good for them if it is shown to a criminal court that the chief prosecution witness is a woman who was more than happy to use perjury (assisted by former recorder John H. Fryer-Spedding and other corrupt judges) in the civil proceedings between us. It would seem that certain policemen, no doubt masons, would hope that by not carrying out their duty to investigate my complaints and evidence I have supplied to them that events will overtake me. I have asked that the Chief Constable of Northumbria, Mr Strachan, now admits or denies membership of Freemasonry. He has not replied. It is my understanding that he is a mason and many of his senior officers are also masons. There is a catalogue of incidences regarding Northumbria Police none action in matters that I have reported to them. These too are to be included in my complaint to the Police Authority. The Masonic Mafia are without doubt now operating against me and are also most certainly being assisted by high authority.
LATEST INFORMATION AS OF SEPTEMBER 25 1999.
Acting Inspector Steve Coxon has still not contacted me following my many telephone calls to Northumbria Police. The Inspector has been appointed to look into my allegations of corruption starting from some thirteen years ago. Obviously this is of concern to me but any failure to carry out duties expected of them by anyone holding public office is held to be a crime under misconduct in public office.
I have only recently realised that the first judge who I went before in my civil proceedings with Miss Carr is a corrupt man and that others at the Durham County Court are also shown to be corrupt by means of the evidence that I now have at hand. On November 10 1992 Deputy District Judge Baird heard my appeal against the judgment of District Judge Scott-Phillips. When I questioned the then Clerk to the Court, Mr. I. Cuthbertson, he replied that he had placed my letter that I had sent to him before the District Judge. The District Judge had said that as my appeal had been concluded then the court would not enter into any correspondence with me. An appeal against an order of a District Judge cannot be heard by a Deputy District Judge. Such an appeal has to be heard by a Circuit Judge. Now does anyone seriously believe that Baird, the District Judge and the Court Clerk were not aware then that the appeal was unlawful? This is the situation being carried on within our courts up and down the country. These people are openly committing the crime of Misconduct in Public Office because they are, I believe, aware that they are being protected by corrupt higher authority.
My wife has still to learn the lessons now being published on the UK human rights site. The publication on the human rights web site, GREED and LAWYERS, is I think something she should take notice of. There is massive evidence of a legal system which is presently acting outside of the law to generate funds for the many parasites who infest both the UK legal and Judicial systems( Cowboy Lawyers) (Solicitors). Injustice, and the funds it generates, is more widespread than most would believe. The more court cases that can be generated, the more the parasites have to feed on. This is about to be brought to an end by the use of LAW and those who continue to act outside of it will have to take the consequences for their actions.
This week I received verification that The Durham County Court is prepared to stop me from carrying out my lawful right to carry out an arrest of at least one corrupt judge, should the police fail in their duty to do that. This matter may yet have to put to the test despite a warning from someone that if I try to carry out the arrest, I might end up being shot by police.
Britain is now ranked second in the abuse of The European Human Rights Charter.
I now actively support the CAMILA Project and the Alternative Press (TAP) as a way forward to achieving a better UK justice system. If the government won't act to reform the judicial system, then there is clearly little option left but to expose what is and has been going on in it for years.
LATEST INFORMATION AS OF SEPTEMBER 13 1999.
Over the past two weeks I have tried on numerous occasions to contact acting detective Steven Coxon who was appointed to look into my allegations in regard to corruption, etc. Each time I have contacted police I have been told that they would leave a message for the acting Inspector to contact me. He has not returned any of my telephone calls to him. I am informed that he is involved in the matter of a young girl who was found murdered at Murton, Co. Durham. A man has now been charged with that murder. While I do accept that murder should always have priority over other matters, I think it also correct to say that it was principle that at least one of my telephone calls to the acting D.I should have been returned. Though my solicitor Mr Hughes said three weeks ago that he would ask for a progress report from Acting D.I Coxon. I now understand from Mr Hughes secretary that none has been forthcoming.
Today I appeared at the Durham Crown Court. I have elected to be tried by jury in regard to harassment allegations, the second in succession made by my civil opponent Miss Shirley Carr my civil court opponent of five years. On 23 August I provided acting D.I. with indisputable evidence of perjury used by Miss Carr during civil proceedings between us. I also provided evidence of former Recorder John H. Fryer-Spedding having not only assisted that perjury, but the fact that he had carried out other very serious acts which amounted to a perversion of the course of justice. This morning a heated argument took place between myself, counsel who was to represent me,and my solicitor. This morning I produced to my solicitor Mr Hughes part of the available evidence that Miss Carr had used perjury during the civil proceedings between us. I also asked counsel who was to represent me this morning if he was a mason. At first he said he was not required to give that information so would not give it, but when I pressed the matter he said he was not a mason but did play golf. I asked him if he played golf with masons which was the cause of bemuse between him and Mr Hughes. He did not answer that question. He did say that I had no way of finding out whether or not he or anyone else was a mason anyway. I replied that there were ways of finding out whether a man was a mason or not. Mr Hughes left the court before I appeared before Judge Wood. I have indicated that as police do appear to be dragging their heels, and there may be a good reason for doing that, then it may be necessary for me to assemble a media circus for me to carry out citizens arrests on those I have named in regard to corruption to police. I have provided evidence to them to back up my allegations of the corruption that has been used against me in the civil court proceedings. Those proceedings allowed the engineering of a bankruptcy order against me. Counsel and Mr Hughes advised against me against carrying out any arrests. Despite promptings by Counsel representing me this morning not to say anything in court other than "not guilty", I did protest to judge Woods that he had made an order which prevented me from having any contact with Carr. I told the judge that on past experience Carr would use that order to best advantage to try to make me breach it. I also told the judge that there was the matter of Carr's use of perjury which she used during the civil proceedings. Counsel representing me appeared less than happy that I had made those statements to judge Wood and turned around and was shaking his head at me. I demanded that all evidence to show that Carr and Spedding had used perjury against me has to be shown to the jury and the court.
I raised the matter with counsel and Mr Hughes of the fact that my